Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 430 P.3d 975 - State v. Parker

State v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Batson v. Kentucky · Whren v. United States · United States v. Jacobsen · Segura v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he factual underpinnings of the district court's decision are reviewed for substantial competent evidence and the ultimate legal conclusion is reviewed de novo.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “To meet the sufficiency standard, evidence must support each element of a crime. When challenged, an appellate court reviews the evidence's sufficiency by '”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “not reweigh evidence, resolve evidentiary conflicts, or make witness credibility determinations. [Citations omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.