Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 430 Pa. 153 - Knable v. Bradley

Knable v. Bradley’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
3
states following
April 2001
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently April 2001 · most notably Hing Bo Gum v. Mataichi Nakamura (1976), Carsek Corp. v. Stephen Schifter, Inc. (1968)

30 state decisions

18019681970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cochrane v. Szpakowski · Warren Tank Car Co. v. Dodson · New Eastwick Corp. v. Philadelphia Builders Eastwick Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[WJhere a contract provides for payments at certain times, and for forfeiture upon default, but the creditor, either by inaction or by an affirmative course of dealing, misleads the debtor into the belief that strict regularity of payments will not be insisted upon, he cannot thereafter declare a forfeiture unless he first gives reasonable notice to the debtor that in the future he will demand performance at the precise times specified in the contract— [This] is a principle, not of law, but of equity. From the strict legal standpoint the creditor is entitled to enforce the forfeiture according to the terms of the contract, but equity, or a court administering equitable principles under legal forms, will not permit him to do so if by lulling the debtor into a false sense of security he has led him into a default which otherwise the debtor might have avoided....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.