Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 430 Pa. Super. 175 - Cochran v. GAF Corp.

430 Pa. Super. 175 - Cochran v. GAF Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Kubrick · Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc. · Karis v. Karis · 324 Pa. Super. 123 - Cathcart v. Keene Industrial Insulation · 351 Pa. Super. 264 - Burnside v. Abbott Laboratories

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “That [Mr. Cochran’s] cancer was causally related to his prior exposure to asbestos could have been ascertained by the exercise of reasonable diligence. The cause was to be found in the tissue removed during surgery and thereafter preserved in slides. If Cochran had consulted a physician and/or a lawyer in 1981, as he did in 1985, the presence of asbestos bodies in the tissue could have been ascertained. Indeed, even such consultation was unnecessary. By making inquiry of the surgeon who performed the surgery or the hospital where the surgery was conducted, the presence of asbestos bodies could have been ascertained. The exercise of due diligence required that inquiry be made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.