Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

430 So. 2d 1002

Vega v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1983-05-11

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1990

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1983-05-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1This is an appeal from a violation of probation. We affirm on the merits but remand for resentencing due to an inconsistency between the oral sentence and the written sentence. The State has conceded the necessity for resentencing.

¶2AFFIRMED BUT REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

BERANEK and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and SMITH, RUPERT J., Associate Judge, concur.
/430/so2d/1002 · .json · Public domain