Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 430 So. 2d 448 - Smith v. State

430 So. 2d 448 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

144
cited by 144 later decisions
7
states following
November 2008
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 141 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 144 later decisions — most recently November 2008 · most notably 547 So. 2d 613 - State v. Smith (1989), 497 So. 2d 863 - Johnston v. State (1986)

1 federal appellate · 141 state decisions

960198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Dade County v. Baker · Borges v. State · Yost v. State · 362 So. 2d 295 - Fundak v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 144 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(4) Whoever, in the course of one criminal transaction or episode, commits an act or acts constituting a violation of two or more criminal statutes, upon conviction and adjudication of guilt, shall be sentenced separately for each criminal offense, excluding lesser included offenses, committed during said criminal episode, and the sentencing judge may order the sentences to be served concurrently or consecutively.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Portee v. State · Wheeler v. State
  2. “a less serious offense is included in a more serious one if all the elements required to be proven to establish the former are also required to be proven, along with more, to establish the latter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Wheeler v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.