Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

430 So. 2d 551

Docket No. 82-1769.

Osborne v. State

Bobby Randall OSBORNE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 29, 1983.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1983-04-29

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“shall include a recital of those facts upon which the adjudication of guilt is based.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 487 So. 2d 1101 - Wells v. State

Relies on Potts v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1983-04-29

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 2007

7 state decisions

30198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Robert W. Pope, P.A., St. Petersburg, for appellant.

¶2Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Ann G. Paschall, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

¶3HOBSON, Acting Chief Judge.

¶4Bobby Randall Osborne appeals an order adjudicating him guilty of direct criminal contempt and sentencing him to 20 days in the county jail. We reject as without merit his arguments that his conduct in question did not constitute direct criminal contempt and that his punishment was disproportionate to the offense. However, we accept his contention that the trial court committed a technical error by failing to recite in the judgment those facts upon which the adjudication of guilt is based, as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830. Potts v. State,330 So.2d 547 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).

¶5Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and remand with directions that the court render a judgment which complies with the requirements of Rule 3.830.

¶6REVERSED and REMANDED.

¶7BOARDMAN and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

/430/so2d/551 · .json · Public domain