Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 430 So. 2d 832 - Read v. State

430 So. 2d 832 - Read v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

255
cited by 255 later decisions
2
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 251 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 255 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably 481 So. 2d 203 - Fisher v. State (1985), 574 So. 2d 685 - McQuarter v. State (1990)

3 federal appellate · 251 state decisions

9201983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Gideon v. Wainwright · Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · Wainwright v. Sykes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 255 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the record affirmatively shows ineffectiveness of constitutional dimensions, or (2) the parties stipulate that the record is adequate to allow the appellate court to make the finding without consideration of the findings of fact of the trial judge.”
    72 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Johnson v. State · Morris v. State
  2. “is not a material witness to the guilt or innocence of the accused,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Graves v. State · Hannah v. State
  3. “a petitioner desiring such a hearing must tender two tickets at the door: (a) a pleading complying with Rule 38, Mississippi Supreme Court Rules, and (b) a pleading stating facts which, if proved, would entitle petitioner to relief.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 434 So. 2d 212 - Smith v. State · 441 So. 2d 1365 - King v. Thigpen

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.