Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

430 So. 2d 964

Kemper v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1983-05-04

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1995

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1983-05-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Defendant appeals an order revoking his probation and imposing a three-year sentence. We find no merit in defendant’s arguments that probation was erroneously revoked. Therefore, we affirm the probation revocation order and sentence.

¶2However, the portion of the order revoking probation which states that probation was revoked because the defendant committed several offenses in Indiana on August 28, 1981, must be stricken. As the state concedes, no evidence was offered at the hearing concerning that alleged probation violation.

¶3Accordingly, we AFFIRM with directions that the foregoing portion of the order be stricken.

OTT, C.J., and SCHEB and LEHAN, JJ, concur.
/430/so2d/964 · .json · Public domain