Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 430 U.S. 325 - Costello v. Wainwright

Costello v. Wainwright’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 9 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2020 · most notably Rhodes v. Chapman (1981), Spain v. Procunier (1979)

19 federal appellate · 9 district · 5 state decisions

430197719801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedCostello v. Wainwright (from Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2281

Relies on Baxter v. Palmigiano · Moody v. Flowers · Morales v. Turman · Costello v. Wainwright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The applicability of § 2281 as written turns on whether a state statute is alleged to be unconstitutional, not on whether an equitable remedy for unconstitutional state administrative behavior ultimately impinges on duties imposed under concededly constitutional state statutes.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “On its face, the complaint that initiated this case involved no challenge to state statutes or regulations. There was thus no reason at the beginning of this litigation to suspect that a three-judge court should hear the case[,]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he possible temporary suspension of an otherwise valid state statute to effectuate federally mandated relief as equivalent to finding that statute unconstitutional.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.