Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 430 U.S. 651 - Ingraham v. Wright

Ingraham v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

4,850
cited by 4,850 later decisions
162
cited 162 times by the Supreme Court
46
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

1,378 federal appellate · 525 district · 650 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4,850 later decisions (162 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably Graham v. Connor (1989), Bell v. Wolfish (1979)

1,378 federal appellate · 525 district · 650 state decisions — followed in 46 states

1.7k0197719801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedIngraham v. Wright (from Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mathews v. Eldridge · Estelle v. Gamble · Morrissey v. Brewer

Cited together with Bell v. Wolfish · Estelle v. Gamble · Parratt v. Taylor · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Harlow v. Fitzgerald

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4,850 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]here is, of course, a de minimis level of imposition with which the Constitution is not concerned.”
    76 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[T]he State does not acquire the power to punish with which the Eighth Amendment is concerned until after it has secured a formal adjudication of guilt in accordance with due process of law. Where the State seeks to impose punishment without such an adjudication, the pertinent constitutional guarantee is the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”
    62 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.”
    33 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.