Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 430 U.S. 817 - Bounds v. Smith

Bounds v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

6,113
cited by 6,113 later decisions
38
cited 38 times by the Supreme Court
48
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

1,952 federal appellate · 575 district · 1,029 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6,113 later decisions (38 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2025 · most notably Bell v. Wolfish (1979), Bonner v. City of Prichard (1981)

1,952 federal appellate · 575 district · 1,029 state decisions — followed in 48 states

2.2k0197719801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedSmith v. Bounds (from Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 753 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2996

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Estelle v. Gamble · Haines v. Kerner · Gideon v. Wainwright · Wolff v. McDonnell

Cited together with Wolff v. McDonnell · Johnson v. Avery · Procunier v. Martinez · Bell v. Wolfish · Lewis Director Arizona Department of Corrections v. Casey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6,113 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the fundamental constitutional right of access to the courts requires prison authorities to assist inmates in the preparation and filing of meaningful legal papers by providing prisoners with adequate law libraries or adequate assistance from persons trained in the law.”
    109 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “a reasonably adequate opportunity to present claimed violations of fundamental constitutional rights to the courts.”
    92 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “adequate law libraries or adequate assistance from persons trained in the law.”
    83 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.