In Re Green’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 707 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Johnson v. United States · Florida Department of Revenue v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc. · Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P. A. v. United States · Hamilton v. Lanning · In Re William M. Behlke
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“My bill would exempt returning Guard and Reserve members from this means test, both because our finest men and women deserve greater financial protection and because they are uniquely disadvantaged by the means test criteria. Despite receiving much-deserved active duty pay for their service, National Guard and Reserve members often take a pay cut when they leave their jobs for a deployment. But because the means test includes the past 6 months of income in its calculation, men and women with little current income may not qualify for bankruptcy protection.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Rowell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.