Brandom v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
431 F.2d 1391 · 1970
Citation profile
97 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 111 later decisions — most recently October 2011 · most notably United States v. Moya-Gomez (1988), United States v. McGlory (1992)
97 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 286
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Kotteakos v. United States · Schaffer v. United States · Weiler v. United States · United States v. Hutul
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 111 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Only when the record contains no evidence, regardless of how it is weighed, from which the jury could find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, may an appellate court overturn the verdict.”
17 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“participated in the same act or transaction or in the same series of acts or transactions constituting an offense or offenses”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.