United States v. Middlebrooks’s Empirical Analysis
431 F.2d 299 · 1970
Citation profile
40 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 28 U.S.C. § 1732
Relies on Holland v. United States · United States v. Radio Television News Directors Ass'n · Powell v. Texas · Linkletter v. Walker · Rodriquez v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Turbonique catalogues said: ‘Can be easily installed with the use of small, basic machine and hand tools.’ Testimony at the trial revealed that a sixteen inch lathe, drill press, and precision balancing equipment were necessary tools for assembling the Turbo-nique Model No. C-2-C Supercharger.” 431 F.2d 299 , 302.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The trial court is accorded an area of discretion in determining admissibility of documents as business records and its rulings should not be disturbed unless that discretion has been abused.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. United States v. Kim
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.