Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 431 F.2d 754 - United States v. Jacobs

United States v. Jacobs’s Empirical Analysis

431 F.2d 754 · 1970

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
January 2025
most recently cited

46 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2025 · most notably United States v. Haldeman (1976), United States v. Evans (1978)

46 federal appellate ·

260197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1621 · 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments) · 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on Dardi v. United States · United States v. First City National Bank of Houston · United States v. Manton · United States v. Geaney · United States v. Russell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he evil sought to be prevented by the deterrent effect of [the bribery statute] is the aftermath suffered by the public when an official is corrupted and thereby perfidiously fails to perform his public service and duty.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “even though the official offered a bribe is not corrupted, or the object of the bribe could not be attained, or it could make no difference if after the act were done it turned out that there had been actually no occasion to seek to influence any official conduct. It is also perfectly plain that the crime is consummated irrespective of whether an offer of an amount of money is accepted by the official.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It is . . . perfectly plain that the crime [of § 201(b)(1) bribery] is consummated irrespective of whether an offer of an amount of money to influence an official's behavior is accepted by the official.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.