Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 431 F.2d 863 - Glasscoe v. Howell

Glasscoe v. Howell’s Empirical Analysis

431 F.2d 863 · 1970

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
2
states following
September 2007
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently September 2007 · most notably Garcia v. Wilson (1984), 13 Cal. 3d 518 - Brown v. Pitchess (1975)

32 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions

4201970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Monroe v. Pape · O'Sullivan v. Felix · Russell M. Smith v. John J. Cremins, Jr., John F. Mahon, Jr. · Bomar v. Keyes · Donald A. Swan v. Board of Higher Education of the City of New York by Gustave G. Rosenberg, Its Chairman, George A. Pierson, and Margaret v. Kiely

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘a deprivation of a constitutional right is significantly different from and more serious than a violation of a state right and therefore deserves a different remedy even though the same act may constitute both a state tort and the deprivation of a constitutional right.’”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(t) he United States Supreme Court has made it clear that an action commenced under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging a deprivation of federal constitutional rights under color of state authority is a broad statutory remedy provided for by Congress.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A Limitation on Actions for Deprivation of Federal Rights,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.