Diamond v. Michigan’s Empirical Analysis
431 F.3d 262 · 2005
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975) · 20 U.S.C. § 1415 · 29 U.S.C. § 720 · 29 U.S.C. § 721 · 29 U.S.C. § 722 · 29 U.S.C. § 723
Relies on Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District Bd of Ed Westchester County v. Rowley · Thomas v. Cincinnati Board of Education · Hinchman v. Moore · Cordrey v. Rj Euckert · Knable ex rel. Knable v. Bexley City School District
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the court finds that the state met both requirements, then the state has complied with the obligations required by Congress under [the Rehabilitation Act], and the court can require no more.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.