Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 431 F.3d 633 - Moreno v. Baca

Moreno v. Baca’s Empirical Analysis

431 F.3d 633 · 2005

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
2
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably United States v. Caruthers (2006), Bryan v. MacPherson (2010)

33 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

370200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Terry v. Ohio · Anderson v. Creighton · Mitchell v. Forsyth · United States v. Leon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[b]ecause the Deputies did not know of Moreno’s parole status ... at the time they searched and seized him, th[is] circumstance[] cannot justify their conduct. At the time of the incident in this case, it was clearly established that the facts upon which the reasonableness of a search or seizure depends, whether it be an outstanding arrest warrant, a parole condition, or any other fact, must be known to the officer at the time the search or seizure is conducted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'[T]he ordinary framework for deciding motions for summary judgment' applies to motions for summary judgment based on official immunity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “We may affirm the district court on any basis supported by the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.