Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 431 F.3d 709 - United States v. Willis

United States v. Willis’s Empirical Analysis

431 F.3d 708 · 2005

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
4
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 7 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably State v. Styles (2008), United States v. Delfin-Colina (2006)

16 federal appellate · 7 district · 4 state decisions

240200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 534 (National Law) · 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Schmerber v. State of California · Whren v. United States · United States v. Cortez · United States v. Sokolow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Was the Court [by its language in Whren], shifting gears, now requiring "probable cause” as the predicate for a traffic stop? The consensus is to the contrary. As Judge William Fletcher has recently observed, the Second, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth and Eleventh Circuits have all “construed Whren to require only that the police have 'reasonable suspicion' to believe that a traffic law has been broken.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “The Fourth Amendment prohibits `unreasonable searches and seizures' by the Government, and its protections extend to brief investigatory stops of persons or vehicles that fall short of traditional arrest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Whren stands for the proposition that if the officers have probable cause to believe that a traffic violation occurred, the officers may conduct a traffic stop even if the stop serves some other purpose.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.