Caudill v. Hollan’s Empirical Analysis
431 F.3d 900 · 2005
Citation profile
18 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably Miller v. Administrative Office of the Courts (2006), Kuhn v. Washtenaw County (2013)
18 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Foman v. Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[O]ur rule is that we will entertain arguments on all objections and asserted errors prior to the final disposition of a case if a party indicates in its notice of appeal that it appeals either the final judgment or the final order in the case.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“). 35 On appeal, Miller challenges the district court's grant of summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity with respect to her First Amendment claim and her claim that she was denied due process in the manner that she was terminated. These arguments will be addressed in turn. C. Miller's First Amendment claim 36 In order to make out a prima facie case that she was terminated in retaliation for engaging in speech protected by the First Amendment, Miller must show: (1) that she”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“is one of the many cases where, if the right is clearly established, the conduct at issue would also be objectively unreasonable,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.