Lakin v. Stine’s Empirical Analysis
431 F.3d 959 · 2005
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably State v. Neyland (Slip Opinion) (2014), United States v. Miller (2008)
11 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Williams v. Taylor · Illinois v. Allen · Estelle v. Williams · Yarborough v. Alvarado
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Thus, where a court, without adequate justification, orders the defendant to wear shackles that will be seen by the jury, the defendant need not demonstrate actual prejudice to make out a due process violation. The State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the shackling error complained of did not contribute to the verdict obtained.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re RWS · Turner v. R.W.S.“When a shackled defendant represents himself, the jury is faced with a constant reminder that the defendant is shackled as he makes statements, questions witnesses, and introduces evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Oviuk v. State“less prejudicial but adequate means of providing security.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.