Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 431 FAPPX 736 - Kumar v. Copper Mountain, Inc.

Kumar v. Copper Mountain, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

3 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Robinson v. Shell Oil Co. · State v. Nieto · Shero v. City of Grove · United States v. Oberle · Graven v. Vail Associates, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Inherent dangers and risks of skiing” means those dangers or conditions that are part of the sport of skiing, 2 including changing weather conditions; snow conditions as they exist or may change, such as ice, hard pack, powder, packed powder, wind pack, corn, crust, slush, cut-up snow, and machine-made snow; surface or subsurface conditions such as bare spots, forest growth, rocks, stumps, streambeds, cliffs, extreme terrain, and trees, or other natural objects, and collisions with such natural objects; impact with lift towers, signs, posts, fences or enclosures, hydrants, water pipes, or other man-made structures and their components; variations in steepness or terrain, whether natural or as a result of slope design, snowmaking or grooming operations, including but not limited to roads, freestyle terrain, jumps, and catwalks or other terrain modifications; collisions with other skiers; and the failure of skiers to ski within their own abilities. The term “inherent dangers and risks of skiing” does not include the negligence of a ski area operator as set forth in Section 33-44-104 (2). 3”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] ski area operator is negligent for failure to warn only when it violates the specific and detailed warning requirements of [the Act] as set forth in §§ 33-44-106 and -107.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “within the section relating to snow conditions as they exist or change, or the provision covering variations in steepness or terrain.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.