Kruse v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 2281 · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 601 (§ 401 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 625 (§ 425 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Brown et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka et al. · San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez · 406 F. Supp. 10 - Alsager v. District Court of Polk Cty., Iowa · 357 F. Supp. 752 - New York State Ass'n for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Rockefeller · Pennsylvania Ass'n for Retarded Children v. Pennsylvania
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No otherwise qualified handicapped individual in the United States ... shall, solely by reason of his handicap, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance . . .”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the fundamental constitutional question is whether the denial of full tuition under ... (the statute) violates the right of handicapped children to the equal protection of the laws.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.