Rodriguez v. Califano’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 16 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently November 2014 · most notably Rutherford v. Schweiker (1982), 34 F. Supp. 2d 208 - Carballo Ex Rel. Cortes v. Apfel (1999)
2 federal appellate · 16 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Eisenstadt v. Baker · Detenber v. American Universal Insurance Co · Underwood v. Ribicoff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The mere presence of a disease or impairment is not disabling within the meaning of the Social Security Act.”). . Social Security Ruling 96-4p provides, in relevant part: 1. A”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is obvious that all of these elements of proof must be considered together and in combination with each other, and not just one or two with the others excluded.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.