Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 431 P.2d 339 - Bennett v. Hall

Bennett v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2015

15 state decisions

90196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bishop's Restaurants, Inc. of Tulsa v. Whomble · Cosmo Construction Company v. Loden · Hansen v. Cunningham · Croft v. Dodson · Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Marzuola

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]s a general rule, a motion for new trial is addressed to the trial court's sound discretion and, absent error as to a pure and unmixed question of law, or arbitrary and capricious action, every presumption should be indulged in favor of the trial court's ruling on appeal.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.