Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 431 PA 124 - Phillips v. Tate

Phillips v. Tate’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 1969
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Furthermore, we recognize, as do all the parties involved, that the proposed eighteen-month budget encompasses two substantial revenue periods while at the same time includes only one substantial expenditure period.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “For the present, the City's fiscal year shall be the calendar year but the Council may by ordinance adopt a different fiscal year.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.