Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 431 Pa. Super. 348 - Slaughter v. Allied Heating

431 Pa. Super. 348 - Slaughter v. Allied Heating’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
August 2013
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently August 2013

21 state decisions

130199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 389 Pa. Super. 430 - O'NEILL v. Checker Motors Corp. · 285 Pa. Super. 241 - Turner v. May Corp. · Vann v. COM., UNEMPLOY. COMP. BD. OF REV. · Vann v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review · 305 Pa. Super. 536 - Quarato v. Facelifters, Ltd.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]here the notice of appeal is timely filed and served upon the non-appealing party and the district justice, the intent underlying [Rule 1005] has been fulfilled and no further purpose remains to be served by penalizing the appealing party for failing to timely file the proofs of service. See Wander v. National Development Corp., 139 Pittsburgh Legal Journal at 370, 12 Pa.D. & C.4th [627] at 628-629; Berry v. Sheaffer, 42 Pa.D. & C.3d [480] at 484; Hyde v. Crigler, 133 Pittsburgh Legal Journal at 271-272, 10 Pa.D. & C.3d [769] at 774. Consequently, the mere failure to file the proofs of service in a timely manner will be disregarded where it is clear that the opposing party has received notice of the appeal and that the purpose of the rules has been satisfied.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.