Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 431 So. 2d 1312 - Ashbee v. Ashbee

431 So. 2d 1312 - Ashbee v. Ashbee’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 2018

10 state decisions

801983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 423 So. 2d 239 - Sizemore v. Sizemore · 380 So. 2d 878 - Blair v. York Engineering Co., Inc. · Lewis v. Lewis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As to the wife's claim that alimony pendente lite should have been awarded, we note that the proper method of seeking appellate review of such an action on the part of the trial court is through a petition for a writ of mandamus.... Since this issue has been raised improperly, we are unable to consider it [in an appeal of a final divorce judgment].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.