431 So. 2d 177 - Wright v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently April 2010 · most notably Polizzi v. Polizzi (1992), 504 So. 2d 418 - Carter v. Carter (1987)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 382 So. 2d 1317 - Mills v. Heenan · 429 So. 2d 36 - Gordon v. Burke
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If no report of the proceedings was made, or if a transcript is unavailable, the appellant may prepare a statement of the evidence or proceedings from the best available means, including his recollection. The statement shall be served on the appellee, who may serve objections or proposed amendments thereto within 10 days of service. Thereafter, the statement and any objections or proposed amendments shall be submitted to the lower tribunal for settlement and approval. As settled and approved, the statement shall be included by the clerk of the lower tribunal in the record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It is well established that the findings and judgment of the trial court come to the appellate court with a presumption of correctness and may not be disturbed in the absence of a record demonstrating error. Wright v. Wright, 431 So.2d 177,178 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gardner v. Caldes“not constitute a complete and adequate record for appellate review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.