Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 431 SO2D 372 - State v. Shapiro

State v. Shapiro’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

478
cited by 478 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

473 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 478 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably 448 So. 2d 676 - State v. Captville (1984), 772 So. 2d 78 - State v. Mitchell (2000)

473 state decisions

18801983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Burks v. United States · Holland v. United States · Smith v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 478 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “assuming every fact to be proved that the evidence tends to prove, in order to convict, it must exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence.”
    29 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “On appeal, the reviewing court "does not determine whether another possible hypothesis suggested by a the Defendant could afford an exculpatory explanation of the events." ... Rather, the court must evaluate the evidence in a light most favorable to the state and determine whether the possible alternative hypothesis is sufficiently reasonable that a rational juror could not have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.... (Citations omitted; emphasis in the original).”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[W]hen circumstantial evidence forms the basis of the conviction, such evidence must consist of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which the existence of the main fact may be inferred according to reason and common experience.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.