Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 431 So. 2d 483 - Davidson v. Rogers

431 So. 2d 483 - Davidson v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably 562 So. 2d 1252 - Wall v. Swilley (1990), 966 F. Supp. 1525 - In Re Gen. Motors Corp. Anti-Lock Brake Products Liability Lit. (1997)

2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

1501983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hunt v. Sherrill · 198 So. 2d 227 - Guastella v. Wardell · 295 So. 2d 284 - Dickey v. Parham · United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Rice · 192 So. 2d 398 - Lloyd Ford Company v. Sharp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n order to recover damages for fraudulent concealment [the plaintiff] must demonstrate [that the defendant] took some action, affirmative in nature, which was designed or intended to prevent and which did prevent the discovery of the facts giving rise to the fraud claim. Davidson v. Rogers, 431 So.2d 483, 485 (Miss. 1983).”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “when testimony is presented which is not improbable or unreasonable the trial court should accept such evidence unless it is contradicted”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.