Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 431 So. 2d 555 - Bush v. State

431 So. 2d 555 - Bush v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

53 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably 494 So. 2d 124 - Magwood v. State (1985), Taylor v. State (1994)

53 state decisions

3501982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · Beck v. Alabama · Proffitt v. Florida · Public Broadcasting Service v. Network Project

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[F]or the reasons set out by the trial court, this capital offense was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel when compared to other capital offenses. Execution-type slayings evincing a cold, calculated design to kill, fall into the category of heinous, atrocious or cruel. Vaught v. State, 410 So.2d 147 (Fla.1982); Combs v. State, 403 So.2d 418 (Fla.1981); Armstrong v. State, 399 So.2d 953 (Fla.1981); Alvord v. State, 322 So.2d 533 (Fla.1975), cert. denied, 428 U.S. 923 , 96 S.Ct. 3234 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1226 (1976). We recognize that an instantaneous death caused by gunfire is not ordinarily a heinous killing. Odom v. State, 403 So.2d 936 (Fla.1981). However, when a defendant deliberately shoots a victim in the head in a calculated fashion to avoid later identification, after the victim has already been rendered helpless by gunshots to the chest, such `extremely wicked or shockingly evil' actions may be characterized as especially heinous, atrocious or cruel. Hargrave v. State, 366 So.2d 1, 5 (Fla.1978)."”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he capital offense was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel compared to other capital offenses,”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'The indictment in this case is couched in language so clear that any person of common understanding would know that the crime of robbery was charged against appellant.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.