State v. McQueen’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

cited by 22 later decisions

states following

January 2018

most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently January 2018

2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Meiers · American Nat. Ins. Co. v. Fox · State v. Stallings · State v. Baker · State v. Robinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

““ * * * This quantum of proof has been variously defined as ‘substantial evidence,’ State v. Rose, Mo., 346 S.W.2d 54 ; State v. Baker, Mo., 277 S.W.2d 627 ; State v. Singleton, Mo., 77 S.W.2d 80 ; ‘evidence putting it in issue,’ State v. Ford, 344 Mo. 1219 , 130 S.W.2d 635 ; ‘any theory of innocence * * * however improbable that theory may seem, so long as the most favorable construction of the evidence supports it,’ State v. Kinard, Mo., 245 S.W.2d 890 ; ‘supported by evidence,’ State v. Robinson, supra [Mo., 328 S.W.2d 667 ]; ‘any theory of the case which his evidence tended to establish,’ State v. Stallings, 326 Mo. 1037 , 33 S.W.2d 914 ; ‘established defense,’ State v. Sumpter, Mo., 184 S.W.2d 1005 ; and ‘evidence to support the theory,’ State v. Shiles, Mo., 188 S.W.2d 7 .” State v. McQueen, 431 S.W.2d 445, 448 (Mo.1968).”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Weems · State v. Westfall
““ . . . This quantum of proof has been variously defined as ‘substantial evidence,’ State v. Rose, Mo., 346 S.W.2d 54 ; State v. Baker, Mo., 277 S.W.2d 627 ; State v. Singleton, Mo., 77 S.W.2d 80 ; ‘evidence putting it in issue,’ State v. Ford, 344 Mo. 1219 , 130 S.W.2d 635 ; ‘any theory of innocence . . . however improbable that theory may seem, so long as the most favorable construction of the evidence supports it,’ State v. Kinard, Mo., 245 S.W.2d 890 ; ‘supported by evidence,’ State v. Robinson, supra [Mo., 328 S.W.2d 667 ]; ‘any theory of the case which his evidence tended to establish,’ State v. Stallings, 326 Mo. 1037 , 33 S.W.2d 914 ; ‘established defense,’ State v. Sumpter, Mo., 184 S.W.2d 1005 ; and ‘evidence to support the theory,’ State v. Shiles, Mo., 188 S.W.2d 7 .” State v. McQueen, 431 S.W.2d 445, 448 (Mo.1968).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Adkins · State v. Westfall
““Homicide shall be deemed justifiable when committed by any person in either of the following cases: (1) In resisting any attempt to murder such person, or to commit any felony upon him or her, * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Thornton

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.