Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 431 U.S. 265 - Douglas v. Seacoast Products, Inc.

Douglas v. Seacoast Products, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

401
cited by 401 later decisions
29
cited 29 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
September 2019
most recently cited

146 federal appellate · 48 district · 47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 401 later decisions (29 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2019 · most notably City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey (1978), Hughes v. Oklahoma (1979)

146 federal appellate · 48 district · 47 state decisions

102019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 16 U.S.C. § 1081 · 16 U.S.C. § 1811 · 43 U.S.C. § 1311 · 43 U.S.C. § 1314

Relies on Dandridge v. Williams · Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody · Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp. · Hagans v. Lavine · Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Paul

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 401 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is pure fantasy to talk of 'owning' wild fish, birds, or animals. Neither the States nor the Federal Government ... has title to these creatures until they are reduced to possession by skillful capture.”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “States may impose upon federal licensees reasonable, nondiscriminatory conservation and environmental protection measures otherwise within their police power.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “`statutory' for purposes of our practice of deciding statutory claims first to avoid unnecessary constitutional adjudications.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.