Dalton v. Austin’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
2 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2002
2 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. Gross · 7 Cal. App. 3d 786 - B.K.K. Co. v. Schultz · 14 Wash. App. 397 - In Re Estate of Thornton · Clark v. Edris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to place their money, effects, labor, and skill, or some or all of them, in lawful commerce or business with the understanding that a community of profits will be shared .... No one factor is alone determinative of the existence of a partnership ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lupien v. Malsbenden“co-owners” as used in the statute does not necessarily mean joint title to all assets. On the contrary,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lupien v. Malsbenden“wrongfully excluded from the partnership business or possession of its property by his copart-ners”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.