Ammerman v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
432 F.2d 621 · 1970
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 294
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. · Toilet Goods Association v. W Gardner · Hunt v. Rousmanier's Administrators · Philippine Sugar Estates Development Co v. Government of Philippine Islands
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We, the undersigned, being all of the remaining Venturers in the GRIGSBY JOINT VENTURE, DO HEREBY CONSENT to the foregoing Collateral Assignment and, in addition, agree that in the event the Promissory Note referred to in the Collateral Assignment is not paid at maturity, that upon thirty (30) days’ written notice from the Assignee [Miller], we will purchase the Joint Venture interest for the face amount of the note.” 5”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ammerman v. Miller
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.