Baum v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
432 F.2d 85 · 1970
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently November 2006 · most notably Jones v. Diamond (1981), International Woodworkers of America v. Champion International Corp. (1986)
20 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1821
Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · United States v. Kolesar · McWilliams Dredging Co. v. Department of Highways · Henning v. Lake Charles Harbor & Terminal District
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[C]osts other than attorneys' fees shall be allowed as of course to the prevailing party unless the court otherwise directs . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“This rule applies with equal force where the United States is a party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Adams v. Carlson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.