Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 432 F.2d 941 - Maggard v. Wainwright

Maggard v. Wainwright’s Empirical Analysis

432 F.2d 941 · 1970

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
February 2010
most recently cited

15 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 2010

15 federal appellate ·

8019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Desist v. United States · Illinois Power Co. v. Local Union No. 51, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers · Jones v. Illinois ex rel. Electoral Board · Hale v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is well established that a trial court may permit the reopening of a case in order that omitted evidence may be presented. Considerable latitude in discretion is vested in the trial court in such matters.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.