United States v. Larison’s Empirical Analysis
432 F.3d 921 · 2006
Citation profile
17 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably United States v. Peltier (2007), United States v. Bungar (2007)
17 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583
Relies on United States v. Booker · United States v. Haack · United States v. Tyson · United States v. Cotton · United States v. White Face
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[the need] to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote respect for the law, to provide for just punishment, and to afford deterrence, recognizing that the guidelines are advisory, and considering all of the statutory goals of sentencing, and considering the numerous and repeated violations of the terms of supervised release, the fact that the defendant was previously a beneficiary of a downward departure or other unusual form of leniency, the fact that the conduct requiring revocation is associated with a high risk of new felonious conduct, and that the defendant is in need of drug treatment that can only be provided in prison.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.