Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 432 FSUPP 657 - Funderburk v. Califano

Funderburk v. Califano’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
December 2004
most recently cited

8 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2004

8 federal appellate ·

501977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Califano v. Sanders · Weinberger v. Salfi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`The Appeals Council exercises the jurisdiction to consider the question of re-opening and revision of the administrative law judge's decision . . . . [T]he Council will carefully consider any additional evidence or information which you may furnish.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`The Appeals Council has carefully considered your [additional evidence] but has concluded that modification of action previously taken is not warranted. . . . Accordingly, the administrative law judge's decision dated July 30, 1976, stands as the final decision of the Secretary in this case.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the additional materials submitted, concluded that modification of the prior decision was not warranted, and held that the administrative law judge's decision dated July 30, 1976,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.