State v. Drader’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2017
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Simmons · State v. Hogie · State v. Saavedra · State v. Thorstad · Davidson v. Nygaard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f conditions of probation are capable of two constructions, we will construe the conditions in favor of the defendant.... “[T]here is great value in making all conditions of release clear and capable of being understood by the offender in order that he knows exactly what is expected of him.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““[W]hen, as here, the proscribed acts are not criminal, due process requires that the probationer receive actual notice. The record must be closely scrutinized to determine whether the defendant did, in fact, receive the requisite warning. Therefore, unless [the offender] received prior fair warning that his acts could lead to revocation, the district court’s revocation violated due process and was an abuse of discretion.” (Citations omitted.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Morstad v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.