Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 432 NW2D 871 - State v. Haverluk

State v. Haverluk’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 2024

18 state decisions

7019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Guerra · State v. Orr · State v. Willis · State v. Jensen · Reiling v. Bhattacharyya

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While the State has the burden of proof regarding representation of counsel in the prior convictions, we believe that after the State provided evidence of representation Haverluk had the burden of going forward with evidence but failed to do so. See City of Fargo v. Christiansen, 430 N.W.2d 327 (N.D.1988).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A statute is applied retroactively when it is applied to a cause of action that arose prior to the effective date of the statute. A statute is applied prospectively when it is applied to a cause of action that arose subsequent to the effective date of the statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.