Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 432 P3D 207 - Harris v. State

Harris v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Gregg v. Georgia · Old Chief v. United States · United States v. Hasting

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “NRS 48.035 requires the district court to act as a gatekeeper by assessing the need for the evidence on a case-by-case basis and excluding it when the benefit it adds is substantially outweighed by the unfair harm it might cause.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[E]vidence is not admissible if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of- unfair prejudice, of confusion of the issues or of misleading the jury.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Photographs have long been used in criminal cases to put before juries the image of dead victims . . . [to] show cause of death, identity of the victim, position of the body, the nature and relationship of the wounds, and the appearance of the scene.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.