Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 432 P3D 752 - Franks v. State

Franks v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2019

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Old Chief v. United States · Petrocelli v. State · United States v. Lemay · State v. Eighth Judicial District Court ex rel. County of Clark · United States v. Enjady

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a criminal prosecution for a sexual offense.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “NRS 48.045(3) unambiguously permits the district court to admit prior sexual bad acts for propensity purposes in a criminal prosecution for a sexual offense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “must simply be helpful or practically necessary.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.