Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 432 Pa. Super. 97 - Commonwealth v. Jones

432 Pa. Super. 97 - Commonwealth v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
December 2009
most recently cited

22 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pennsylvania v. Ritchie · Commonwealth v. Tuladziecki · Kremer v. Grant · Poola v. UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REVIEW · Lavelle v. Koch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(2) Discretionary With the Court. In all court cases, except as otherwise provided in Rule 263 (Disclosure of Testimony Before Investigating Grand Jury), if the defendant files a motion for pretrial discovery, the court may order the Commonwealth to allow the defendant’s attorney to inspect and copy or photograph any of the following requested items, upon a showing that they are material to the preparation of the defense and that the request is reasonable: (a) the names and addresses of all eyewitnesses[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(a.l) Previous conviction. — For purposes of this section, it shall be deemed that a defendant has been convicted of another drug trafficking offense when the defendant has been convicted of another offense under section 13(a)(14), (30) or (37) of The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, or of a similar offense under any statute of any state or the United States, whether or not judgment of sentence has been imposed concerning that offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “upon the first conviction... and, upon conviction for another offense subject to sentencing under this section:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.