State v. Patterson’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 1997
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Ker v. State of California · Sedillo v. United States · Harris v. United States · United States v. Lee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"A party desiring to recuse a trial judge shall file a written motion therefor assigning the ground for recusation. The motion shall be filed prior to commencement of the trial unless the party discovers the facts constituting the ground for recusation thereafter, in which event it shall be filed immediately after the facts are discovered, but prior to verdict or judgment. If a valid ground for recusation is set forth in the motion, the judge shall either recuse himself, or refer the motion for hearing to another judge or to a judge ad hoc, as provided in Article 675."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Williams“We find that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing to refer the motion to another judge for hearing. * * * * * * Our review of the transcript of the entire proceedings, especially the trial itself, indicates that the trial judge was even handed throughout the trial, and that counsel's apprehensions over his ability to obtain a fair trial were mistaken.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Williams
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.