McMillan v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 1985
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Pell v. Procunier · Day v. State · Smith v. State · Moffett v. State · Donilson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"A verdict of conviction cannot be disturbed on the grounds of insufficiency of the evidence `. . . unless, allowing all reasonable presumptions for its correctness, the preponderance of the evidence against the verdict is so decided as to clearly convince this Court that it was wrong and unjust.' [Citation omitted.]" McMillan v. State , 432 So.2d 508 , 509 (Ala.Cr.App. 1983).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.