Holland v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

cited by 9 later decisions

states following

March 2012

most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 110 So. 2d 654 - Williams v. State · Clifton v. City of Fort Pierce · Clark v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“WHETHER RELEVANT EVIDENCE OF A DEFENDANT'S PARTICIPATION IN A COLLATERAL OFFENSE WHICH HAS BEEN NOLLE PROSSED IS ADMISSIBLE? IF NOT, WHETHER THE ERROR MAY BE HARMLESS?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 466 So. 2d 207 - Holland v. State
“[n]othing we say here forbids admission under the `Williams Rule' of relevant evidence of collateral crimes for which acquittals have not been obtained.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 466 So. 2d 207 - Holland v. State
“suggests that the [collateral] charge was nolle prossed for reasons unrelated to the strength of the state's evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 466 So. 2d 207 - Holland v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.