Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 432 SO2D 62 - Greene v. Greene

Greene v. Greene’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
3
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2011

14 state decisions

901983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 45 Ill. App. 3d 849 - Zalduendo v. Zalduendo · 180 Ind. App. 351 - Campbell v. Campbell · 417 So. 2d 1047 - Bedingfield v. Bedingfield · 378 So. 2d 812 - Trujillo v. Trujillo · Lopez v. DIST. COURT, FOURTH JUD. DIST., ETC.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) A court of this state shall not exercise its jurisdiction under this act if, at the time the petition is filed, a proceeding concerning the custody of the child was pending in a court of another state exercising jurisdiction substantially in conformity with this act, unless the proceeding is stayed by the court of the other state because this state is a more appropriate forum or for other reasons.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “there is a glaring dearth of evidence that the child and the parents have any significant connection with the state.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “respectfully request that the Florida court refrain from exercising jurisdiction over the same cause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.