432 So. 2d 837 - State v. Armstead’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
45 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably 445 So. 2d 1184 - State v. Jarman (1984), 683 So. 2d 218 - State v. Strickland (1996)
45 state decisions — followed in 13 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Amperex Electronic Corp. v. New York Racing Assn., Inc. · Kerr v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California · Holder v. United States · Schuyler National Bank v. Bollong · Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. Prepmore Apparel, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'there is no possibility of a conscious misrepresentation.'”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“Upon its own motion the court may, and upon the request of the state or the defendant the court shall, order that the witnesses be excluded from the courtroom or from where they can see or hear the proceedings and refrain from discussing the facts of the case or the testimony of any witness with anyone other than the district attorney or defense counsel. The court may modify its order in the interest of justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.